Stephen King likes his epics. The Stand was his version of Lord of the Rings and it was already plenty long in 1990 when he added 329 pages to make it his longest book ever, clocking in at 1,153 pages. It was his massive epic about childhood and adulthood coming in at 1,138 pages. And in 2009 he delivered Under the Dome, his third longest book at 1,072 pages. But an epic is about more than mere page count, it’s about an author’s ambitions, and King’s epics deliver as many characters as we can handle, overflowing a town-sized stage, battling The Forces of Absolute Evil in books like ‘Salem’s Lot, The Tommyknockers, Needful Things, Insomnia, Desperation, and The Regulators.
But an interesting thing’s been happening as King gets older: his books have been shrinking. Starting with 1987’s Misery, but especially with 1992’s Gerald’s Game, he’s limited himself more and more to one or two characters in a single location (Dolores Claiborne, The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon), and when he has given us that epic scale and scope in books like Cell, Lisey’s Story, Duma Key, and 11/22/63 he’s seen the action through the point of view of one or two characters. It’s something he came to late (King didn’t even publish a first person novel until Dolores Claiborne in 1992) but since Insomnia in 1994 he’s approached his epics from a more intimate perspective. But Under the Dome is a throwback, a massive King-sized epic hoagie, dripping with fillings, the size of ‘Salem’s Lot and Needful Things, done the old fashioned way: cramming in absolutely everything he can lay his hands on, and letting it all hang out.
King has occasionally claimed that he originally started Under the Dome in 1972, but I can’t find much evidence to back that up besides this one statement to the New York Times. Most evidence points to the following chronology. In 1976 or 1977, King wrote the opening chapter of a book called Under the Dome, and later lost the pages. In 1981, while on location shooting Creepshow, King took another stab at the story, calling it The Cannibals about a large cast of characters trapped in an upscale apartment building. He wrote 500 pages (you can download the first 122 of them on his website) “before hitting a wall.” In 2007, inspired in part by Ken Follett’s massive historical novels, he took a third run at the material, and this time he wrote the entire book in 15 months. “I was on fire,” he told the New York Times.
Some folks have pointed out that King’s novel, published in November, 2009 bears a close resemblance to 2007’s The Simpsons Movie in which Springfield is placed under a giant dome, but it also plays with a concept explored in Clifford Simak’s 1965 novel, All Flesh is Grass, about a small town that wakes up one morning to find itself trapped beneath a dome placed by extraterrestrials who want to study their reactions. Then again, The Cannibals was pretty reminiscent of JG Ballard’s 1975 novel, High-Rise, about a luxury high-rise whose residents descend into anarchy and decadence when they seal themselves off from the outside world. It’s also inspired at least in part by Lost, which was pushing peak popularity when King was writing Under the Dome, and the mystery of the Dome with its competing characters trying to decipher weird clues to escape their circumstances, felt more than a little like America’s one-time favorite TV show.
I’ve got a complicated relationship with Under the Dome, because I recapped all three seasons of the TV adaptation and incurred brain damage as a result. Personal injuries aside, Under the Dome is a hell of a book. Does it strain credulity by having a town of 2,000 descend into open warfare after being cut off from the outside world for only a week? Yes. Is its political message broadcast at a volume so loud it can cause permanent hearing loss? YES. Does it demonstrate once again that there is no top that Stephen King can’t vault over one-handed with a cry of “Geronimo!” on his lips? Absolutely. But it also answers the question of why Stephen King has sold 350 million copies of his books: the guy can tell a story.
Under the Dome starts with Dale Barbie, a noble drifter, leaving the tiny town of Chester’s Mill, Maine after getting jumped in the parking lot of a local bar by a bunch of thugs, including Junior Rennie, son of local bigshot and used car dealer, Big Jim Rennie. This is pretty much exactly how we first met saintly Nick Andros way back in The Stand, and the two characters are virtually identical, save that Barbie can talk. Barbie is a main character who’s as anonymous as they come, with no character flaws or traits to get in the way of our identification with him as he races through the breakneck plot that kicks off in the very first chapter. We’re not even on page ten when an impenetrable dome suddenly surrounds Chester’s Mill, reaching 47,000 feet into the sky and 100 feet underground. It causes a plane crash and bisects a chipmunk, giving the TV show one single moment when it topped the novel.
Capitalizing on the town’s sudden isolation from the rest of the world, Big Jim Rennie (who is, of course, a Republican) turns himself into a tiny tyrant, deputizing his insane son, and putting the town under this control. A cardboard cut-out right-winger, Big Jim is not only a big fat hypocrite (the ultimate evil for King) but he bemoans the local bar which he calls a “sinpit”, refuses to use profanity even as he murders his opponents with his bare hands, drives a Hummer, hates President Obama (referring to his middle name “Hussein” as “the terrorist one in the middle”), has a secret porn stash, and bans liquor sales. His churchy exterior conceals the soul of a monster who’s been stealing the town’s propane to power his crystal meth plant hidden inside the Christian radio station he owns. He’s also gotten the local hellfire and brimstone preacher, Lester Coggins, to help him with his meth business. The Rev. Coggins is so twisted and perverse he commits crimes, quivering with an almost-sexual arousal, then flagellates himself for his sins. These are not subtle characters.
But subtle is not on the menu. We first meet Junior Rennie, Big Jim’s son, on page 19, delivering a whiny, self-pitying inner monologue, the sun giving him a headache. Three pages later, he’s calling his girlfriend’s vagina her “goddam itchy breeding-farm”, biting through his own tongue, and bashing her brains out on the floor. Eighty pages later he murders Dodee, her best friend. Two hundred pages later, he’s having sex with their corpses, and there’s still 800 pages to go. Barbie, Julia Shumway, the local reporter, and their other allies are bland and colorless compared to Junior Rennie, Big Jim, the Rev. Coggins, and the rest of the book’s bad guys, making it apparent that while King may hate these villains and what they represent, they inspire his best writing in a way his heroes don’t. And it’s not just the bad guys who are turned up to 11. King’s writing style is in full-on “Heeeere’s Johnny!” Jack Nicholson mode, as loud and blaring as an axe smashing through a bathroom door.
“Suddenly he was swept by horripilation. The goosebumps swept up from his ankles all the way to the nape of his neck, where the hairs stirred and tried to lift. His balls tingled like tuning forks, and for a moment there was a sour metallic taste in his mouth.”
Musical balls aside, some of these ideas were there from the beginning. The Cannibals featured a blue collar, alpha male, NRA member named Pulaski who calls everyone “babycakes” and stockpiles guns in his apartment, including an uzi. And there’s a simpering, god-fearing, overweight, overly-religious woman with an “utterly closed mind” who seems to be on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Both of them appear marked to develop into villains later in the book. But despite its deep roots, Under the Dome is King’s response to the Bush Administration, much in the same way that Cell was his response to 9/11 and the War in Iraq. Starting with an airplane crash (reminiscent of 9/11), Chester’s Mill descends into anarchy under its criminal Republican leadership which uses religion to mask its criminal activities. As they scramble to enrich themselves and conceal their crimes, the leadership and its enemies both ignore dangerous greenhouse gases building up inside the dome that threaten to kill them all. Worried that people might not get the obvious point, King even said, “I want to use the Bush-Cheney dynamic for the people who are the leaders of this town.” Big Jim is clearly Dick Cheney, staying in the shadows, manipulating elected officials with the greatest of ease, and deeply dangerous. Politicians are powerless in the face of his iron will, allowing Big Jim to deal drugs, murder, and steal with total immunity. Just to really drive the point home, Barbie, a war veteran, is prone to saying, “It’s like Iraq all over again.”
But cartoonish as the political allegory gets, UtD is studded with massive set pieces that bring every character crashing together with a satisfying boom. Whether it’s the dome’s arrival over Chester’s Mill, an outdoor rally by the townsfolk that descends into farce and then tragedy, Junior Rennie and his debauched police buddies gang raping one of their former friends, a food riot at the local supermarket, or the final firestorm that sweeps through town and consumes all its oxygen, these scenes are the kind of big Thanksgiving feasts that King creates for his readers, tying napkins around their necks, and pushing them up to the groaning table before letting them dig in. They’re deeply satisfying and he pulls them off with a lot of invisible craftsmanship, juggling multiple characters and intense action without ever once dropping the ball.
Written in short, propulsive chapters of about 20 to 30 pages each, with each chapter divided into three or four subsections that can run as short as a single page, UtD leavens its breakneck pace with a mordant sense of black humor. After one character dies on his John Deere riding mower which keeps chugging along, King writes, “Nothing, you know, runs like a Deere.” The ending feels like a let-down as we discover that the Dome was put in place by punky little alien kids who were goofing around with their parents’ technology. When they learn that the ants on their ant farm are actually getting hurt by their game, they shut it down immediately. It’s a letdown, but after the massive table we’ve gorged ourselves at, anything less than Junior Rennie crater-humping the Moon until it explodes is going to feel like an anticlimax. This is a long book, but not a repetitive one, and it rarely spins its wheels. After all, King has to push civic society to the breaking point and beyond in just seven days. It took the Bush Administration at least a couple of years to do the same.
Grady Hendrix has written for publications ranging from Playboy to World Literature Today; his previous novel was Horrorstör, about a haunted IKEA, and his latest novel, My Best Friend’s Exorcism, is basically Beaches meets The Exorcist.
Thank God I never started reading this horrid novel. The whole concept is obscene and just reading the description of it nearly drove me crazy.
I’m pretty sure Christine was his first novel from a first person perspective. However, Christine was godawful and worth forgetting
This was one of the worst King books of all time.
Holy hell, and I thought the TV show was ridiculous. I’m glad I never picked this one up either. I did enjoy your recaps of the first season and a half while I was watching the show though.
For me the ending ruined the whole book. It was “The Squire of Gothos” all over again.
I enjoyed this quite a bit once I got chugging along but the ending did ruin the rest of the book for me.
Perene, I hate to be that guy, but Christine is in three parts, and while the first and third parts are in first person, the middle of the book (about 186 pages) is in third person, so I wasn’t counting it. But I do agree with you otherwise – Christine is the only book of King’s that I actually deeply dislike.
I too was annoyed by the time-frame. When I first read this book I thought it took place over weeks, if not months. I was more than willing to buy the disintegration of the town over that period of time. After a couple of days…not so much. IIRC, King has an on-going problem with shoehorning events into shorter time spans than seem reasonable.
I guess I’m in a *major* minority here when it comes to the ending of the novel. I liked it. “Under the Dome” is an over-the-top satire of U.S. militarianism, nationalism, and jingoism. It’s an indictment of U.S. culture and leadership as a whole that focuses on the ugliest aspects of U.S. society and policy. On a deeper level, it’s a condemnation of bullying. The U.S. has a long history of “bullying” the Other both within and without our borders (I say “our” because I am a U.S. resident.) We’ve never really put down Teddy Roosevelt’s “big stick.” It’s not accidental that Barbie keeps thinking of Iraq and, more specifically, the torture at Abu Ghraib, which is a chilling example of what those in power will do to those who are at their mercy. It is my understanding that, in the years since the torture at Abu Ghraib came to light, experts have said it was not a fluke but rather emblematic of the inhumane way that a lot of the U.S. military treated prisoners during the Middle East conflicts.
I believe King is saying that, in the end, increased military force or authoritarian/fascist leadership or patriotism run amuck is not the solution. Bigger explosions or “Junior Rennie crater-humping the moon” (I will admit this line made me laugh out loud for a long time!) are not the solution. If we want out of the vicious cycle the U.S. is locked into, we need to show at least some sincere humanity towards the Other. Remember that near the climax of the novel Julia remembers being bullied by her female classmates when she was younger. They took her clothing and left her to walk home half-undressed and ashamed. Then one of the girls comes back after the others have left and gives Julia a long sweater to wear home that will “look like a dress” so that she won’t be humiliated on her walk home. Julia says that girl didn’t apologize, or be nice to her afterwards, or even stop being a bully. But for a moment she showed a glimmer of humanity, which meant everything to Julia.
That’s exactly what the alien child in “Under the Dome” does when confronted by Julia. (King also has a nice not-very-sub-text here about mob psychology; people who behave abominably in groups can be half-decent on a one-to-one level.) The alien child doesn’t suddenly start thinking of the people under the dome as people – just like how Julia’s bully doesn’t suddenly have empathy for her victims. But, as King says, a brief moment of humanity and maybe even compassion is a start. Putting down that “big stick,” even just for a moment, is the beginning of turning one’s back on bullying.
I also liked that, in the end, it was *Julia* who saved the day. King has an unfortunate tradition of strong female characters who, for one reason or another, aren’t present to be heroic at the narrative’s climax. In “Under the Dome,” he subverts his own trope; Julia steps up when Barbie can’t.
Finally, I have to note that “Under the Dome” seems awfully prescient given what is going on in the U.S. right now. I’m going to issue a disclaimer here. I am NOT a Trump supporter. If you are, YYMV. I’m not trying to start any political arguments! ;) But right now in the U.S. we have a president who is TRYING to shut us off from the outside world (wall on the Mexican border, pulling the U.S. out of international agreements), uses inflammatory rhetoric to build and maintain his support base like Big Jim does (white supremacists and neo-Nazis can be “very fine people”), denies climate change like Big Jim downplays the greenhouse effect taking place in the dome, and manufactures crises (North Korea, anyone?)as distraction from ongoing, far more serious issues (financial de-regulation and union-busting). We even see Trump’s “war on the press” and the attempted supression of free speech in what happens to Julia’s newspaper. Now, let’s all hope that there aren’t sociopathic alien children pulling the strings in the background… :P
PS: Did anyone else notice that the symbol on the box that generates the field is the same as the symbol on the door to It’s lair? :)
Thanks for linking to the Under the Dome rewatch. I lost the best part of the morning reading and sniggering.
I really dug this book. One of those where it didn’t really feel as long as it was just because of how enjoyably over-the-top everything was.
The only real complaints I had were the ending and the simple fact that certain people acted like complete morons in order to ensure Rennie ran the town up until the end. Like the wife of the police chief, who had VERY incriminating evidence against him…so she met him in private to tell him. I mean, the concept of normal people making really bad decisions under an abnormal amount of pressure isn’t anything new with King (The Mist is a great example), but here, it just seemed less bad decisions under pressure and more bad decisions made to make sure the plot goes as intended. In fact, a lot of people made comically bad decisions concerning Big Jim all the way up to Carter the Moronic’s failed attempt to kill him in the bunker.
I enjoyed this one, but yeah, the ending was meh. If I’m honest I think endings are Kings greatest weakness. I’ve read just about all of his books buy now, and I can only think of a few with excellent conclusions. So the ending being just so-so was not big shock.
As for the TV show…got it was bad. The changes were not even the thing that got to me. I think if they had just run it as a single season show, might have been OK. Drawing it beyond that was just a bridge too far.
As for the political aspect, it’s kinda like hitting softballs. Steinbeck; King is not. I just read him for fun, and he’s had bad guys of all flavors. Besides, almost every small town has some form of Big Jim. King just turned him up to 12.
I can’t say this was King’s worst novel…I reserve that honor for The Tommyknockers, which is basically an exploration of how men can’t deal with menstruation…but it was hit or miss. The easy characterizations were a disappointment, because King has done better. That said, I think UtD was a necessary step to get us to the drop-dead fantastic Bill Hodges series of books.
I’m surprised that you didn’t mention that in the Afterword King thanks the two or three (I don’t recall the exact number) of ecologists and climate scientists he consulted while writing the book. The serious challenges that arise because of the greenhouse gases, fires, behavior of the townspeople, etc. are the direct causes of some of the reprehensible behavior and panic that occurs between characters, and the horrific spot the characters are in at the end–literally a few seconds from death–is because of their failure to protect their environment from themselves. Yes, the whole alien angle was ridiculous–and the series went even farther in the ridiculous angle, much as I loved Marg Helgenberger–and something of a copout. But that is unfortunately common with King, too. He is very good at the buildup and not so good at the endings.
JaimeW, I also thought the sign on the box as somewhat similar to the sign on the door to the Tommyknocker’s ship. Maybe it’s all related.
That said, I think I am the only person who really likes, nay LOVES, The Tommyknockers. I’ve read it twice, 17 years apart and enjoyed it both times. It’s just so bonkers.
I am flabbergasted by all the positive reviews for this piece of shit. No book has ever made me want to punch the author in the face as this ome did, and King is my favorite writer! I just dont understand why King loves reveling in dumb hick characters and fucking morons who refuse to believe a slick talking used car salesman may be a shady character? And it just so happens that Jim Rennie’s political opponents are either killed or arrested? Why doesn’t King understand that this sledgehammer heavy handed approach grows quite tedious over 1000 pages.
And I could go on about the dozens of interesting angles he could have taken in exploring what would happen if a town was completely sealed off from the outside world with limited resources. Instead King decided to spend a thousand Pages following a cartoon villain whose whole master plan is predicated on staying trapped in a town with no power and dwindling food supplies. WHAT A RE YOU GONNA DO WHEN THE FOOD RUNS OUT AND THE AIR BECOMES UNBREATHABLE GENIUS.
And don’t give me that political allegory crap. If Rennie were safe on the outside pulling strings, then maybe it would make sense. In the real world the problem is that these political hacks are making decisions that won’t affect them personally because they’ll be long in their graves before any consequences come to bear.
Bottom line: this book may have worked for me if Tevie wasnt deliberately trying to make his readers gnash their teeth at the ridiculous one dimension antagonists to simply make a point. He broke one of his own rules: never hate any of your characters no matter what bad things they do or say. L
A little subtlety and nuance would have gone a long way.
Oh crap I can’t believe this, I’m rereading the book right now and I don’t remember it being this infuriating. Maybe its being told Barbie is gonna be framed around Page 200 and he doesnt get arrested for another 300 pages. Maybe its the 30+ crucial moments where either Big Jim or Junior continue getting away with all their lies by sheer dumb luck. I’m not kidding. Ive counted at least 39 times where one of them should be caught red-handed or exposed by their lies but some random occurrence happens that gets them out of a jam or someone decides they’ll sit on some smoking gun evidence for a few days. My favorite being when the selectwoman, Andrea, decides to bring a gun to the town meeting to convince everyone that Big Jim is the real threat, not Barbie and bis imaginary cohorts. Before she can finish the damming sentence she DROPS THE GUN OUT OF HER PURSE and causes a shootout and riot that can be attributed to Barbie. Then Junior just so happens at that moment to start blowing cops away right before the hero’s can non-violently spring him from his cell. Now tgose cop deaths can be hung on Barbie as well. HOW MANY TIMES can someone remark “Well, thats pretty convenient” or “Rennie sure got ANOTHER lucky break there” before you go insane? Am I making ANY sense, Grady?
Strangely when I first read this in 2012 I remember being annoyed but not angry. Maybe its because I can imagine a version a lot like this one but with 3 dimensional antagonists.